There’s something most leaders do – we avoid the conversation that needs to be had. We care too much about the wrong things: how the other person will react, whether it will make things awkward, whether we’ll be the one blamed if they go off sick. Our ingrained programming tells us that keeping the peace is the same as keeping the relationship, but it isn’t.
In this episode, Joe Weston is back for round two to explain why conflict avoidance – the silence, the corridor moaning, the feedback we give and immediately want to apologise for – is itself a form of conflict. And what it actually sounds like to hold someone accountable without becoming someone you don’t like.
We cover:
- Why avoiding difficult conversations feels kind but functions as a form of conflict
- The difference between confrontation (which can deepen a relationship) and conflict (which breaks one)
- How to hold someone accountable without triggering their fight-flight-freeze response
- Why focusing on behaviour — not the person — changes everything, and exactly what to say instead
- The “difficult middle bit”: what to do when someone gets defensive, and you want to back down
- Why doctors, nurses, vets, and other professionals already have the skills for hard conversations — just not yet with their colleagues
- How small, intentional acts of relationship-building change the culture around accountability over time
